Keeping up with the Joneses
By James Herman
President, State Bar of California
|
Herman |
Starting with Aaron and ending with Yale, there are nearly 800 California lawyers
named Jones to keep up with. Figuring it might be interesting to find out their
thinking on the pluses and minuses of the State Bar and our profession, I decided
to make some cold calls to a few of them. Included were big city and small town
lawyers, an out-of-state lawyer, late career professionals, a new admittee,
a government lawyer, small firm lawyers and big firm lawyers.
Everyone was a pretty good sport except one poor associate who had to get a
complaint out on a 45-minute deadline.
Typical of those I contacted, Truckee solo litigator Aaron Jones, admitted
in 1959, feels the State Bar is doing a pretty good job. When asked what he
liked about the bar, he raised the educational programs of the State Bar sections.
Workers’ compensation lawyer Yale, admitted in 1966, agreed. Yale also
feels The Other Bar and the Lawyer Assistance Program for members with substance
or alcohol problems are well worth the $10 contributed by every member through
bar dues. “Saving lives and careers is well worth the money.”
Member number 224797, admitted May 23, 2003, and more commonly known as Kyle
Jones, even thought the bar does a good job of administering an admittedly tough
bar exam. A personal injury litigator with the Bakersfield Law Offices of Ralph
Wegis, he is so excited about his new career that he missed Kern County’s
formal swearing-in to take a deposition. He sees the web site opportunities
as high impact member service.
XXXX Jones agreed to a cameo appearance even though her first name cannot be
revealed because her Really Big San Francisco Law Firm requires all interviews
to go through a press officer. This former journalist with more than 20 years
as a corporate lawyer for life science and other tech start-ups praised the
bar’s discipline system “as our greatest member benefit.”
My local friend (and the only lawyer I knew in advance) Chris Jones, a longtime
Santa Barbara litigation/estate planning lawyer, noted, “There used to
be a perception the bar was not spending wisely, but I think the bar is now
staying much truer to its mandate.”
He did question whether the discipline system was tough enough based on discipline
reports. He also does not think much of the California Lawyer magazine. When
I pointed out CL was not a State Bar publication and that his interview would
be in the Bar Journal, he was quick to point out he liked any publication carrying
his quotes.
Like Aaron and Yale, he appreciates the sections and added, “I never
thought of going to the State Bar Annual Meeting until last year, but it’s
the best educational value there is — no matter what your specialty, the
programming is top notch.”
Yale and Chris also value specialty certification in workers’ compensation
and estate planning, respectively, for marketing and public protection value.
Yale added he was the first chair of the State Bar’s Board of Legal Specialization
and argued the bar petition to the Supreme Court to add the program. “Rose
Bird was afraid certification would not be inclusive, but actually the opposite
is true,” he said.
Organized bar experience among the members I talked to ranged from Yale’s
to XXXX’s, who has never been a bar joiner. Aaron was proud of board membership
in the Truckee bar.
Just for comparison, I ran “Jones” and “Arizona” on
our Member Access advanced search and came up with San Jose refugee and Phoenix
labor lawyer Robert K. Jones of Quarles Brody Streich Lang.
Robert pays $390 to California in dues and $410 to Arizona. Arizona requires
15 hours of MCLE per year versus 25 every three years for California. He values
his California membership and sees the license as an important benefit in and
of itself.
What troubles our members? The economy. As XXXX put it, “we have not
seen the bottom yet here in the Bay Area.” Although the dues are significant,
no one felt they are too high and everyone was pleased the dues will stay at
the same level for another year.
Quality of life was also an issue. Yale, with a daughter in a big firm and
a son coincidentally named Aaron at Georgetown Law School, worries the billable
hour is making slaves of our young lawyers.
And Aaron from Truckee sang the praises of small-town relaxed practice. Yale,
on the phone from his New Mexico retreat, added he is now practicing on a part-time
schedule and loving it. Members also are concerned about the climb in professional
liability premiums (we are working on this) and the breakdown in collegiality.
Overall, it was hard to trigger a criticism of the bar even by invitation.
Of course there is discontent out there. Matt from Calavaras County at an event
last month was quick to point out his feeling members never hear from the bar
except when we ask for money or discipline someone. (Calavaras County Bar Association
President Sheron McCarthy was a great host for this, by the way). On the other
hand, my unannounced drop-in on an Angels Camp family law solo drew positive
comments for the job we do.
My philosophy has always been to provide member service one member at a time
from the top down.
Let me close with my favorite example:
“Dear President Herman,” wrote Dale, a member practicing in Pocatello,
Idaho. “I am outraged by the ARROGANCE and RUDENESS of the State Bar.
See enclosed, unsigned! I was accused of passing an NSF check to pay my bar
dues. What really happened is I stapled my check to the dues statement and some
State Bar staffer ripped off the routing number when they were separated so
the check would not clear my bank. As you can see, this is entirely the fault
of the State Bar. I DEMAND THAT THIS BE TAKEN CARE OF IMMEDIATELY AND I DEMAND
AN APOLOGY FROM THE STATE BAR!” To a litigator, DEMANDS! are a part of
life. So, using the telephone number on the top of the State Bar form letter,
I got through immediately to a State Bar staffer and asked how the problem could
be solved (No, I didn’t identify myself as president). Politely, she informed
me all I had to do was send another check.
Relieved for Dale, I called his Pocatello number identifying myself. There
was a pause. “You mean you’re the State Bar president, the guy I
wrote to?” “Yes,” I said. “Heck,” he said, “I
didn’t think anybody would really get back to me. I was just venting.”
“Well, Dale,” I said, “I have taken care of your problem
and I apologize on behalf of the State Bar for any inconvenience.” There
was a pause. “Well,” he said, “if you ever get to Pocatello,
I would love to take you to lunch.” The State Bar now has a friend in
Pocatello, Idaho.
|