California Bar Journal
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 2000
spacer.gif (810 bytes)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This article is provided solely for research and archival purposes. MCLE self-study credit is no longer available. Even if you follow the instructions and submit payment you will not be granted MCLE self-study credit. Please note that low-cost MCLE is provided by the California Lawyers Association, pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6056.

MCLE SELF-STUDY

spacer.gif (810 bytes)
Self-Assessment Test
spacer.gif (810 bytes)

Answer the following questions after reading the MCLE article on public entities. Use the answer form provided to send the test, along with a $20 processing fee, to the State Bar. Please allow at least eight weeks for MCLE certificates to reach you in the mail.


1. The term “public employee” under the Tort Claims Act includes officers of a public entity.

2. As a general rule, it is best to assume that a city manager does not qualify as a public employee under the Tort Claims Act.

3. The Tort Claims Act does not apply to causes of action for breach of contract.

4. In most cases, a party seeking a writ of mandate in the trial court will be required to comply with the Tort Claims Act’s claim presentation requirements before the filing his/her/its petition for writ of mandate.

5. Causes of action against public entities under the Tort Claims Act are frequently based upon common law theories of recovery.

6. Civil Code §3479 serves as a sufficient statutory basis for liability against public entities in nuisance actions.

7. Public entities cannot be vicariously liable for injuries caused by their employees.

8. In an action against a public entity for injuries caused by one of its employees, the entity may utilize the employee’s statutory immunities in defending the action.

9. In an action against a public entity for its failure to perform a mandatory duty, the entity may utilize statutory immunities available to its employees in defending the action.

10. Public entities are not entitled to utilize defenses to liability that are ordinarily available to private persons or entities.

11. When a public entity defends an action that is based on an injury caused by one of its employees, it may only utilize the statutory immunities that apply to public employees and may not utilize any of the public entity immunities.

12. A public entity may be liable for a dangerous condition of public property, even though it had no actual notice of the condition.

13. If it has actual notice, a public entity is always liable for dangerous conditions of public property.

14. All of the statutory immunities available to public entities and public employees are found in the Tort Claims Act.

15. It is important to research the immunity provisions of the  Tort Claims Act before filing an administrative claim with a public entity.

16. The statute of limitations for filing a claim with a public entity is always one year.

17. Public entities have up to six months to take an action on a claim once it is filed.

18. If a public entity denies a claim and files the appropriate notice, the plaintiff has six months within which to file a complaint.

19. If a public entity takes no action on a claim, the plaintiff has two years from the filing of the claim to file a complaint.

20. Complaints against public entities must usually include a statement of compliance with the Tort Claims Act or a statement that compliance with the Tort Claims Act was not required.