California Bar Journal
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA - MARCH 2002
spacer.gif (810 bytes)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This article is provided solely for research and archival purposes. MCLE self-study credit is no longer available. Even if you follow the instructions and submit payment you will not be granted MCLE self-study credit. Please note that low-cost MCLE is provided by the California Lawyers Association, pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6056.

MCLE SELF-STUDY

spacer.gif (810 bytes)
Self-Assessment Test
spacer.gif (810 bytes)

Answer the following questions after reading the MCLE article on modifying debt. Use the answer form provided to send the test, along with a $20 processing fee, to the State Bar. If you do not receive your certificate within four weeks, call Ibrahim Bah at 415/538-2028.


1. Income resulting from the satisfaction of a debt for less than the amount owed is always excluded from income.

2. Section 61(a)(12) sets forth the general rule concerning the treatment of income from cancellation of indebtedness ("CODI").

3. In addition to the exceptions described in §108, taxpayers may avail themselves of several judicially created exceptions to the rule of §61(a)(12).

4. Section 108(a) does not apply to solvent taxpayers.

5. A taxpayer must satisfy each and every one of the exclusions described in §108(a) in order to exclude CODI from income.

6. A taxpayer may elect to have §108 apply.

7. In some instances, bankrupt and insolvent taxpayers might be excluded from employing §108(a) for the purpose of excluding CODI.

8. For purposes of §108(a), a taxpayer is bankrupt if a bankruptcy petition has been filed concerning him.

9. A taxpayer is insolvent if the amount of his liabilities exceed the basis of his assets.

10. The amount of CODI excludible from income under the insolvency exception of §108(a)(1)(B) may not exceed the amount by which the taxpayer was insolvent immediately before discharge.

11. Contingent liabilities may always be counted as liabilities for purposes of §108(a)(1)(B). 

12. Assets exempt from the claims of creditors under state law should nevertheless be considered when conducting an insolvency determination.

13. A taxpayer who excludes CODI under §108(a) must reduce the amount of his tax attributes by the amount of CODI excluded.

14. Debts which are deductible by the taxpayer do not create CODI.

15. Section 108(e)(5) applies to all taxpayers.

16. Debt reduction granted by the seller of property to the purchaser of property may always be excluded from gross income.

17. CODI results if a person related to the taxpayer purchases the taxpayer's debt from a party unrelated to the taxpayer for less than the amount owed.

18. A son-in-law is not a related party for purposes of §108(e)(5).

19. The United States Tax Court and IRS are at odds over how exempt assets should be treated when determining a taxpayer's insolvency. 

20. Accrual basis taxpayers are less likely to utilize the exclusion from income set forth in §108(e)(2).