| 
           The Supreme Court's recently completed term
          undoubtedly will be remembered most for its decision on Dec. 12, 2000,
          in Bush v. Gore. For the first time in American history, the Supreme
          Court decided the outcome of a presidential election. Beyond Bush v.
          Gore, it was a term that lacked major blockbuster constitutional law
          decisions, but did significantly change the law in some key rulings
          concerning federal civil rights statutes. Several themes can be
          identified for October Term 2000, which began Oct. 2, and ended June
          28, 2001. 
          Ken-Connor court 
          This is the Ken-Connor Court, with Justices
          Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O'Connor controlling the outcome of
          most cases. The current Supreme Court can be best understood as having
          three factions: a conservative block of Chief Justice William
          Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas; a moderate
          block of Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
          and Stephen Breyer; and the "swing" Justices Sandra Day O'Connor
          and Anthony Kennedy.  There
          are no liberal justices in the mold of a William Douglas or William
          Brennan or Thurgood Marshall.  More
          often than not, Justices O'Connor and Kennedy vote with the three
          conservatives and thus 5-4 decisions most commonly have a majority of
          Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas. This, of course,
          was the line-up in Bush v. Gore.  
          Also, it is the split in all of the court's
          federalism decisions in the last few years, which limit federal power
          and expand state sovereign immunity. This term, for example, in
          University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 121
          S.Ct. 955 (2001), the court held, 5-4, that state governments may not
          be sued for employment discrimination in violation of section one of
          the Americans with Disabilities Act.   | 
      
      
        | 
            Shortly
          after David Baldacci's best-selling first book hit the newsstands in
          1995, the attorney- turned-author of the great American novel quit his
          day job. And despite - or maybe because of - the many manuscripts
          lawyers thrust on him at speaking engagements, Baldacci says he
          doesn't recommend his former colleagues follow suit. "People say
          there are so many lawyers out there using their experience to write
          bestsellers," Baldacci said recently from his home in Virginia.
          "Let's actually look at the numbers here. You can count maybe six
          ... after that it's hard to name some more." 
          On
          Sept. 7, the former Washington, D.C., civil litigator and corporate
          lawyer will address attendees of the |