| Texas lawyers do battle with do-it-yourself legal software | 
      
        |  | 
      
        | By MATT RICHTEL New York Times
 | 
      
        |  | 
      
        | A controversial group of Texas lawyers, deputized by the state to protect
        citizens against unauthorized legal advice, has lost its battle to ban the sale of the
        popular self-help legal software package Quicken Family Lawyer '99. [A possible
        showdown with Nolo Press, a pioneer publisher of do-it-yourself legal advice that has
        branched out into software and the Internet, was averted when the Texas group dropped an
        investigation of the Berkeley-based publisher.] Whatever the ultimate outcome of the debate, the two sides - along with outside legal
        observers - say the conflict raises important questions about self-help law in the digital
        age.  The general controversy surrounds the proliferation of self-help Internet sites and
        software, which are intensifying the long-standing tension between the publishers of
        do-it-yourself legal materials and the traditional legal establishment.  Some lawyers say that the self-help materials oversimplify the law  | 
      
        | See TEXAS LAWYERS | 
      
        | 
 | 
      
        | NEWMCLE
 COMPLIANCE DEADLINES
 | 
      
        | GROUP 2 Last names H-M
 | 
      
        | Should have completed 36 MCLE hours by Jan. 31,
        1997 | 
      
        | Those who did comply must
        complete: 25 hours by Jan. 31, 2001 | 
      
        | Those who did not comply must complete: 61 hours
        by Jan. 31, 2001 | 
      
        | Next compliance deadline: 25
        hours by Jan. 31, 2003 | 
      
        | GROUP 1 Last names A-G
 | 
      
        | Should have completed 36 MCLE hours by Jan. 31,
        1998 | 
      
        | Those who did comply must
        complete: 25 hours by Jan. 31, 2001 | 
      
        | Those who did not comply must complete: 61 hours
        by Jan. 31, 2001 | 
      
        | Next compliance deadline: 25
        hours by Jan. 31, 2004 | 
      
        | GROUP 3 Last names N-Z
 | 
      
        | Should have completed 36 MCLE hours by Jan. 31,
        1999 | 
      
        | Those who did comply must
        complete: 25 hours by Jan. 31, 2002 | 
      
        | Those who did not comply must complete: 61 hours
        by Jan. 31, 2002 | 
      
        | Next compliance deadline: 25
        hours by Jan. 31, 2005 | 
      
        | 
 | 
      
        | Chair of MCLE review tackles job 'with no options barred' | 
      
        |  | 
      
        | By NANCY McCARTHY Staff Writer
 | 
      
        |  | 
      
        | A commission appointed to examine the State Bar's decade-old
        continuing education requirements will approach its task "with no options
        barred" and hopes to be finished by June. Former bar president David Heilbron, who
        is heading the 12-member group, said it has a wide-open charter and every aspect of the
        MCLE program will come under scrutiny, "even including doing away with it."  The group is
        charged with studying requirements in other states and other professions in California,
        and Heilbron said it also will look at the quality of classes, the special requirements of
        ethics, substance abuse and elimination of bias, and the number of hours attorneys must
        complete.
 In recently enacted legislation authorizing the bar to collect dues for the coming
        year, the MCLE program was scaled back from 36 to 25 hours every three years (see
        compliance chart above), and the law practice management requirement and the
        exemption for retired judges were eliminated. "We don't see our charter as being limited by what the legislation requires,
        although it seems clear we couldn't go below what the legislation requires," Heilbron
        said. He also noted that the group will be guided by an August Supreme Court decision
        which upheld the MCLE program and found that exemptions for certain groups, including
        retired  | 
      
        | See MCLE REVIEW | 
      
        | 
 | 
      
        | Bar honors legal giant Joseph Ball | 
      
        |  | 
      
        |  Joseph A. Ball, a giant of
        legal history in California, received the Bernard E. Witkin Medal from the State Bar last
        month. The 96-year-old trial lawyer was honored for a distinguished record of
        accomplishment and devotion to the law which "personifies the highest standards of
        the profession." The Witkin Medal recognizes attorneys "who have changed the
        landscape of California jurisprudence." Ball's impressive resume includes serving as a member of  | 
      
        | See JOSEPH BALL |